Return-Path: Received: from fsun.fe.think ([unix socket]) by fsun.fe.think (Cyrus v2.4.18-Fedora-RPM-2.4.18-2.fc24) with LMTPA; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 06:21:44 +0100 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.4 Received: from listserv.isdn4linux.de (www.fritz-elfert.de [82.165.11.104]) by fsun.fe.think (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id uAJ5Lg9T030881 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 06:21:42 +0100 Received: from mail-qt0-x22e.google.com (mail-qt0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d:0:0:0:22e]) by listserv.isdn4linux.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id uAJ5LZYQ011483 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 06:21:37 +0100 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at listserv.isdn4linux.de Authentication-Results: listserv.isdn4linux.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=yWFrlU3g Received: by mail-qt0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id n6so171298997qtd.1 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 21:21:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2ZJMf94L5Zb89kQSV5mm06DwhDHgEASrLMEmcz78eeY=; b=yWFrlU3g1pWELp6Nx4Mm6k6Wve35AUBPHQwIns0ZD8oEJ38/rNH2hXW+iJ28Y4X4QV qova9PZ9Ki8ROAg8JLlCU+P0kded0HrBejon2nS+CUXTOVG5hy5q21YznmEcq7ie3Eb6 40NcGK0nI5V2nmEEJYqV6rT6JPoDIjlMyTXFAJQNj9LkgMahgFCM0LOIasRKbZZ5DoeE sUyFTie0qgI4dlidH/px39K8HwFmho0NojhZ1mfsCkpCPBOlPYtJlLa0YRa0tzYehlbk IrComhKUZfC7nZyJZHgK+TAtVRyJJuF9TJH42EFBGb39OehVi46BVPzhvk0qBGcr3iuP sC3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=2ZJMf94L5Zb89kQSV5mm06DwhDHgEASrLMEmcz78eeY=; b=j3AdiaNT3FKNs5CCwKKA664yn8ibyr7WED16+TXvHrEzzug5jfDLhUJ0iT6bdOv8Z5 kjCgo2+STuwmIEFudNVGL1Xyhs2/YJJw3Rx6T6Ou3r3eu/l+6+UnKTzBT/Y90E+ep45A MgkHcXNUfBeHMdW8/Ag4rhqGgczEyQNYaxvUS7gzBfmqHvxal4Qf5A0XtBYY5SdWGLZo mLRWBMSvTn3Z3PsaeucQrol0AXgj0Rzm+B4YN6kgYZPseA6rYH6tRMt3yY+0GHmJdyxU TxeKFt04x1SNPc4/kVW83rJIBeiVPZR+AihWbEvrc01HFynERN7xd4lGUCIaP1+zqLkt r5OQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03p6Pm3EsFA7rhOh3eMuymkOnnac4EGW6Vu959YD1KFQGH1hDdBSvUOK5dy2/IGWyfxwdzvFW3V4xKcPg== X-Received: by 10.28.126.146 with SMTP id z140mr2088955wmc.84.1479532895423; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 21:21:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <55ba8045-08a6-8f68-8daf-12b152c432cb@fritz-elfert.de> In-Reply-To: <55ba8045-08a6-8f68-8daf-12b152c432cb@fritz-elfert.de> From: Andrew Bayer Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 05:21:24 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Licensing decision for jenkins jclouds plugin required To: Fritz Elfert , adrian@jclouds.org, m.mavlyutov@gmail.com, mail@vijaykiran.com, mordred@inaugust.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11417a9aaa53600541a098c8 X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6 (listserv.isdn4linux.de [IPv6:2001:8d8:912:a9e:ab05:ddc6:eb4a:1ffd]); Sat, 19 Nov 2016 06:21:38 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1-i4l X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1-i4l (2015-04-28) on listserv.isdn4linux.de --001a11417a9aaa53600541a098c8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Either the ASL or MIT license would be fine by me. A. On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 6:30 PM Fritz Elfert wrote: > Hi guys, > > I am writing to you, because you were initiators resp. are > co-maintainers or major contributors of the JClouds Jenkins Plugin > https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/JClouds+Plugin > > I am the current maintainer of this plugin and recently was asked about > its license. To my surprise, there was *no* licensing information *at* > *all* in any of the sources. > > My thoughts regarding a license were: > It uses apache-jclouds as its primary functionality and therefore it > should have the same license (Apache 2.0 License) > > Before officially choosing this license, I just want to ask for your > opinion: > > ==> Are you ok with choosing Apache 2.0 License for this plugin? > > I will only choose a license, if I get a simple majority (meaning: at > least 3 of you should agree). So please just take the time for a short > answer. > > Thanks > -Fritz > > --001a11417a9aaa53600541a098c8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Either the ASL or MIT license would be = fine by me.

A.

= On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 6:30 PM Fritz Elfert <fritz@fritz-elfert.de> wrote:
Hi guys,

I am writing to you, because you were initiators resp. are
co-maintainers or major contributors of the JClouds Jenkins Plugin
https://wiki.jenkins-= ci.org/display/JENKINS/JClouds+Plugin

I am the current maintainer of this plugin and recently was asked about
its license. To my surprise, there was *no* licensing information *at*
*all* in any of the sources.

My thoughts regarding a license were:
It uses apache-jclouds as its primary functionality and therefore it
should have the same license (Apache 2.0 License)

Before officially choosing this license, I just want to ask for your
opinion:

=3D=3D> Are you ok with choosing Apache 2.0 License for this plugin?

I will only choose a license, if I get a simple majority (meaning: at
least 3 of you should agree). So please just take the time for a short
answer.

Thanks
=C2=A0-Fritz

--001a11417a9aaa53600541a098c8--